Deadlock

November 29, 2013

Pet Restraints May Not Prevent Accident Injuries, But New Standards Could Improve Safety. – Article 493

Filed under: Rezulin — Lawyer @ 4:37 pm
Tags:

Source

Driving with pets in the car can be a distraction for motorists and it can be a risk for pets and people. Many pet owners who want to travel with their canine companions but who are serious about safety attempt to make the responsible choice and use a pet restraint to keep their dog secured in the vehicle as they drive. Unfortunately, new evidence indicates that many pet restraints fail to provide adequate protections.

bichon2-1429569-m

People injured in a car accident can consult with a car accident lawyer in Seattle to obtain compensation for their own injuries and for the wrongful death of a family member. Pets, however, are treated as property and usually there is little or no compensation provided to cover the costs of their injuries or to compensate family members for the loss of a beloved pet who is killed in a car accident. Pet owners who wish to do everything possible to keep their animals safe deserve to have the information they need about pet car restraints, and new standards now may make this possible.

Pet Safety Restraints Aren’t Doing the Job

Manufacturers of pet safety restraints have long advertised their products as tested and as proven safe, yet these claims have had virtually no actual meaning up to this point and could not be substantiated. There are no uniform safety standards and no uniform test protocols in place in the United States for pet travel products, and thus the claims made by manufacturers were just based on whatever internal testing the companies decided to do on their own.

Subaru of America and the Centers for Pet Safety, however, have now taken the first step towards providing more protection for pet owners and their canine companions. Parade.com reports that Subaru and CPS enlisted an independent testing laboratory that is used by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to conduct crash tests. The lab, MGA Research Corporation, was asked to perform tests not just with people but also with pets.

More…

Pet Restraints

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

November 27, 2013

Problems with Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants Canadian Institute Health Survey Reaffirms

Filed under: Benzene — Lawyer @ 6:46 pm
Tags:

Source

It has become abundantly clear as a result of numerous medical studies and reports of complications to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that metal-on-metal hip implants are disastrous for patients. Our experienced attorneys know that metal-on-metal products are marketed primarily to younger and more active individuals with the promise that these new medical devices will last longer than traditional hip implant systems. Unfortunately, it seems the exact opposite is true.

1385746_hospital

The high failure rate of metal-on-metal hip implants has been confirmed in yet another in-depth study, this one conducted by the Canadian Institute for Health. As reported by CBC News Health, the study showed that  the failure rate of metal-on-metal devices was not just higher, but was around twice as high as the chances of failure with metal-on-plastic implants.

Canadian Health Institute Survey Shows High Failure Rates of Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacement Products 

The Canadian Institute for Health study involved a review of 56,942 hip surgeries that were performed from 2003 through 2011 throughout Canada.  Of the hip implant surgeries included in the study:

  • Twenty-three percent of patients had received metal-on-plastic implants.
  • Nine percent of patients had received metal-on-metal implants.
  • Eight percent of patients had received ceramic-on-ceramic implants.
  • Five percent of patients had received ceramic-on-plastic implants.

More…

Personal injury lawyers

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

November 22, 2013

Lansing Personal Injury Lawyer Car Wreck – Report 712

Filed under: Truck Accident — Lawyer @ 6:04 pm
Tags:
Car wreck needing an attorney - Lansing Personal Injury Lawyer Auto wreck

There are many different legal issues you need to consider after a seriousn accident. That’s why it’s important you contact the Law Offices of Gary M. Bloom as soon as possible to discuss your case. Even if the other person admitted wrongdoing – there’s no guarantee verdict you deserve to cover the true cost of your accident.

any people only think about the near-term costs associated with an accident caused by someone else’s negligent behavior. Attorney Bloom thinks differently. He takes into account how much you will actually need to cover your accident-related expenses many years down the road. Will you need assistance from a nurse or home health-care worker? Will you be unable to return to work? Was your ability to move or function permanently affected by your accident? Attorney Bloom will take all these issues into consideration and make sure your settlement or verdict reflects these factors. Case results matter here.

The Law Offices Of Gary Bloom
39040 W. 7 Mile Road
Livonia, MI 48152-1006
Tel: (734)464-1700

It’s difficult to know what to do after a serious back and neck injury caused by an auto accident is overwhelming. Instead, many auto accident victims are forced to deal with insurance companies contacting them with endless questions that seem innocent. Insurance companies are focused on one thing: paying people as little money as possible. That’s why it’s important you contact the Law Offices of Gary M. Bloom. We deal with the insurance companies on your behalf so you can focus on on what is important: your recovery. Maybe you need a Lansing MI personal injury attorneys?

If you have been in a truck accident, insurance companies and truck accidents truck accidents can also be confusing. Sometimes, there can be several insurance companies involved in one accident. One insurance company might represent the driver. A company might represent the truck company. Besides the driver and their company, sometimes another third insurance company might even be involved, representing the interests of the company whose cargo was being transported on the truck.

With motorcycle accidents, they can also be confusing. There are many legal issues to consider and many questions you need answered. That’s why you need the Law Offices of Gary Bloom on your side. We serve clients throughout Michigan and Ohio, attorney Gary Bloom has a strong track record for getting people the compensation they rightfully deserve. He also experience understanding Michigan’s unique laws governing motorcycle accidents.

To talk more contact a lawyer.

Personal injury lawyers

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter

November 20, 2013

SAN ANTONIO Texas Breaking613

Filed under: Car Accident Lawyers — Lawyer @ 4:03 pm
Tags: ,

SAN ANTONIO, Texas
– They didn’t get to watch their children grow up into young adults. They missed saying goodbye to grandparents, and in one case, a father, before those loved ones passed away.

But three women who were released from prison on Monday after spending more than a decade behind bars – for crimes they say they didn’t commit – said they relished their new-found freedom and would continue fighting for their full exoneration.

“I got to meet my son for the first time since he was 4,” said Liz Ramirez, 39, who along with the other women spoke with NBC News on Tuesday in their first interview since their release. “It was an amazing feeling, being in his arms.”

Personal injury lawyer san antonio

What sent the women to prison – Ramirez received a 37.5-year sentence and the others each got 15 years – were allegations of abuse leveled by Ramirez’s two young nieces, then 7 and 9 years old. The girls accused the four friends of sexually assaulting them twice in late July 1994 while they were visiting Ramirez at her apartment.

The women’s lawyer, Michael Ware, said the trial transcripts showed inconsistencies in the testimony given by the girls. But the crucial witness was a doctor who testified that the older girl’s hymen bore a scar that could only have come from abuse around the time of the alleged attacks, Ware said.

“He didn’t know how to be around me or even know what to say. It was kind of hard,” she said. “But it’s okay, kind of take it one step at a time.”

The women started to make progress getting their story heard in 2008 when a Canadian fish biologist took interest in their case. He then convinced the National Center for Reason and Justice, a watchdog group dedicated to identifying false allegations of harm to children, to get involved. Next was the Innocence Project of Texas and Ware, a former member of the Conviction Integrity Unit in Dallas.

About two years ago, the alleged younger victim, Stephanie Martinez, 26, began to question if the attacks really happened. She eventually recanted her story to the media.

Martinez said she came to realize: “My aunt never hurt us. She was a mom to us,” she said late Monday as she waited in her car for the group to emerge from jail. “It didn’t happen.” She recalled that week in 1994 with her “Tia Lisa” and her three friends: Liz making her and her sister a great breakfast, going swimming and playing with neighbor kids.

Martinez said she would help however she could with the group’s bid to get a full exoneration and hopes she can still have a relationship with her aunt. “If she would want to have one with me after everything,” she said. “I want her to be a part of my children’s life just how she was a part of mine.”

Martinez’s older sister maintains the attack still happened. The four women said they don’t blame the girls and applauded Martinez for coming forward.

“I believe it was a brave thing for her to do. I’m very, very proud of her,” Rivera said.

Ramirez said she would accept her niece with open arms, “because that’s what love does. It’s unconditional.”

The women, who couldn’t have contact with each other in prison, enjoyed re-connecting since their release. They considered themselves family nearly 20 years ago – and that hasn’t changed.

“The comfort was still there,” Rivera said. “It’s falling right back into place, because we’re family.”

The next part of their journey will be pursuit of “actual innocence,” which is possible under Texas state law, though Ware said winning such a declaration was extremely rare. But the women said there is no stopping them.

“We want actual innocence because that’s what we are,” said Mayhugh, who spent nearly 14 years in prison. “We’re actually innocent.”

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/11/19/21540535-san-antonio-4-speak-out-after-prison-release-were-actually-innocent?lite&ocid=msnhp&pos=1

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Next Page »

Theme: Rubric. Get a free blog at WordPress.com